Monday, February 9, 2015
2015 Nissan Qashqai Review Specs
2015 Nissan Qashqai Review Specs
2015 Nissan Qashqai Review Specs-That pairing occupies an extremely specific space. It’s that almond-shaped sliver from the Venn diagram exactly where Nissan’s plaudit-winning loved ones crossover meets Land Rover’s plush, hot-cake-selling small 4x4.
2015 Nissan Qashqai Review Specs
From new, even the most valuable Qashqai costs below the cheapest five-door Selection Rover Evoque, but delve into the Evoque’s back catalogue and there’s charges parity: our long-term Qashqai 1. 6 dCi Acenta Quality with pearlescent color lists at £25, 155 new, while 2012 Evoque eD4s inside entry-level Pure spec are now able to be had from £25, 750 with fewer than 20, 000 miles on the clock.
Both have 5 doors and 5 seats and push their front wheels only with a four-cylinder diesel motor and six-speed guide gearbox.
This second-gen Qashqai can be sharper-looking, more upmarket plus much more refined than the 1st. It is an amazing piece of kit – engineered for purpose using a good helping of quality to start.
But can promoted hope to combination it for design and comfort together with something wearing an array Rover badge? And can the Rangie offer the practicality and parsimony to consider it to the Nissan in relation to daily chores and household finances?
Our thoughts on how these vehicles look shouldn’t bring much weight, but the ways in which they fill what on earth is essentially a common footprint – the Evoque’s extra 159mm of width would be the only notable exterior discrepancy – could barely become more different.
And in such an image-conscious market place, it’s hard to argue which the Evoque’s arresting aesthetic isn’t a serious reason why it’s the fastest-selling used car in britain. Sure, this new Qashqai looks bolder compared to the über-conservative original, but near the Evoque, it seems more than a little plain.
In which theme continues inside. The Qashqai’s cabin is hard to help fault for ergonomics, ease and solidity, but its cosmetic anonymity means you’d battle to pick it out in the line-up if an individual stuck gaffer tape in the steering wheel employer. Meanwhile, the Evoque delivers new levels connected with design and high end.
There’s high-quality leather on the seats, dashboard and grab handles, and also the cabin’s smart, geometric shapes contrast with the Qashqai’s faddier, swoopy wrinkles.
Dinginess is a complaint you could level against each interiors, and that feeling is heightened from the Evoque, with it is smaller glass area.
Read the total Range Rover Evoque examine
However, although the stove Rover’s squashed-sandwich profile shows that there’s not much light from the back, it does allow for a respectable amount of space – any six-footer can fortunately sit behind a different with enough space above and in the front, although the Qashqai provides a fair bit far more legroom despite it is fractionally shorter wheelbase.
A corner seats split and fold in each, boosting load room from 430 to help 1585 litres from the Qashqai and from 575 to 1445 litres from the Evoque.
The Nissan’s room is more uniform and better to access, and it is two movable shoe panels add freedom, including the substitute for make an completely flat floor with the seats folded, how the Range Rover can’t pretty manage.
Litreage with the other end can be less closely harmonized, but the Qashqai’s 1. 6 makes a respectable 128bhp against the Evoque’s 148bhp 2. 2, and the Nissan is actually quicker, taking 9. 9sec to reach 62mph instead of the Evoque’s 11. 2sec. The truth is, both are nippy all-around town.
It’s only on the motorway that the Evoque’s extra 90kg and bulkier form start to tell, with the granular although well mannered motor straining when goaded as the Qashqai’s smoother product springs on. Both equally exhibit turbo lag although pull comfortably from below 2000rpm and simmer down very well in sixth.
See the full Nissan Qashqai examine
Shifting gear is a great deal more rewarding in the stove Rover. Its stubby lever’s limited throw is enjoyably small and stocky whereas the Nissan’s extended action feels looser. So it is to use the steering, the Evoque’s helm sensation much weightier compared to the Qashqai’s, even in the event the Nissan is inside Sport mode.
Both equally set-ups are very well progressive, though. Spirit these vehicles down a twisty road and also the British-built Japanese offering yields the harder car-like experience, containing roll and resisting dive greater than Gaydon’s finest, though the Evoque’s greater trail and wider tyres provide loans it higher restricts of grip.
The flipside is which the Evoque has the comfier ride in every situations, smothering scars and ridges using a stately lope, along with only a small tendency to fidget on the motorway to endanger the peace. The Qashqai’s trip niggles that bit more, most obviously in town, and, in quantity, it feels tauter although less settled.
The Nissan delivers more gizmos. Items like sat-nav, traffic indication recognition, auto low-beam, street departure warning, entry and rear airport parking sensors (the standard Evoque gets rears only), panoramic roof and rear privacy glass are included here although cost extra on the Range Rover.
Usually, the Evoque counters with luxury and style: leather, 18-inch alloy wheels and an 11-speaker audio system are standard healthy. Those hungry pertaining to kit could defer into a higher-mileage Evoque built with the Tech pack and stay in the same budget. The pack price tag £1900 from new and includes sat-nav, entry parking sensors and rain-sensing wipers.
Official figures say which the Evoque will price tag about 12 % more in gas, and its larger emissions attract £130 inside annual road tax for the Qashqai’s £30. Nissan London West charges £159 and £249 for the Qashqai’s alternating small and major once-a-year services.
Lookers Land Rover in Battersea, Birmingham, asks £392 and £515 for the Evoque, but that declines to £325 and £429 for cars more than three years previous.
2015 Nissan Qashqai Review Specs
If you could stand those additional running costs, the Evoque would be the clear winner. It’s a mite less practical and possesses less safety kit, but you’d by no means call it not practical or unsafe, and also the luxury and comfort it ladles on put it well beyond the Nissan’s reach.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.